Post by KNOWTHIS on Jul 15, 2004 21:00:30 GMT -5
I just thought that Boomerchick and Jersey should know when they are being defamed by the vile undercarriage of society. 
p090.ezboard.com/fcontrailsandchemtrails22884frm1.showMessage?topicID=2402.topic
Letxa obsessed with CTC members as always, this is starting to progress into a stalker level status. Ladies, avoid any contact with any nerdy looking men with pocket protectors, stinking of Tequila & burritos. It may be our suspect hunting you down? Approach all morons sharing similar characteristics with extreme caution. These degenerates have been known to bore people to death.
"...You know, most of you people probably have been debating these mixed nuts far longer than I have. But I'm starting to wonder: Are they all as incoherent and flame-prone as it would seem? Is there, or has there ever been, a chemtrailer/conspiracy nut that actually debated in a focused, coherent, intelligent manner?
I ask because my first exposure to these people was at CTC and I was exposed to the likes of JerseyBlueEyes, ShowMeTheTruth, BoomerChick and the infamous electricmojoman. When you debate them they all seemed pleasant for about 1 message, then became quite short by the second or third, and by the fourth they were usually flaming you, diverting attention from the debate to flaming you or focusing on you (and then they had the gall to say I wanted to be the center of attention!). And, more recently, I've been debating a couple mixed nuts over at 13th Century regarding the Federal Reserve conspiracy and more recently Fahrenheit 9/11, and once again it is amazing how they follow the exact same pattern. They challenge you to debunk the theory (or the movie), you do, and then they start bringing up everything they can except the real issues.
Just for once I'd like so very much to engage in an intelligent debate on the facts with one of these conspiracy critters. Just once I'd like an intellectual challenge. Just once I'd like to actually be challenged by one of these people rather than having them move into flame mode just went the debate is getting interesting. But I have yet to see a single one that is up to the challenge. Inevitably they start flaming, bringing up tangent conspiracy theories to try to prove another conspiracy theory, etc..."
Stick to your Fox News theories pal! You know, the widely accepted and most successful conspiracy of all. We're independant, free standing thinkers while you are hopelessly dependant upon Rupert Murdoch.
p090.ezboard.com/fcontrailsandchemtrails22884frm1.showMessage?topicID=2402.topic
Letxa obsessed with CTC members as always, this is starting to progress into a stalker level status. Ladies, avoid any contact with any nerdy looking men with pocket protectors, stinking of Tequila & burritos. It may be our suspect hunting you down? Approach all morons sharing similar characteristics with extreme caution. These degenerates have been known to bore people to death.
"...You know, most of you people probably have been debating these mixed nuts far longer than I have. But I'm starting to wonder: Are they all as incoherent and flame-prone as it would seem? Is there, or has there ever been, a chemtrailer/conspiracy nut that actually debated in a focused, coherent, intelligent manner?
I ask because my first exposure to these people was at CTC and I was exposed to the likes of JerseyBlueEyes, ShowMeTheTruth, BoomerChick and the infamous electricmojoman. When you debate them they all seemed pleasant for about 1 message, then became quite short by the second or third, and by the fourth they were usually flaming you, diverting attention from the debate to flaming you or focusing on you (and then they had the gall to say I wanted to be the center of attention!). And, more recently, I've been debating a couple mixed nuts over at 13th Century regarding the Federal Reserve conspiracy and more recently Fahrenheit 9/11, and once again it is amazing how they follow the exact same pattern. They challenge you to debunk the theory (or the movie), you do, and then they start bringing up everything they can except the real issues.
Just for once I'd like so very much to engage in an intelligent debate on the facts with one of these conspiracy critters. Just once I'd like an intellectual challenge. Just once I'd like to actually be challenged by one of these people rather than having them move into flame mode just went the debate is getting interesting. But I have yet to see a single one that is up to the challenge. Inevitably they start flaming, bringing up tangent conspiracy theories to try to prove another conspiracy theory, etc..."
Stick to your Fox News theories pal! You know, the widely accepted and most successful conspiracy of all. We're independant, free standing thinkers while you are hopelessly dependant upon Rupert Murdoch.
, and the ridiculously simple and boorish questions he asks! Believe me, if I was on that board again, I would avoid him like the plague!! 
